Mercy Killing:Another Perspective

Mercy killing: A View from another Prism

Mercy killing also known as euthanasia describes a situation where a doctor quickens the death of a patient suffering from an incurable disease like cancer, neurogenerative (dementia) or cardiovascular diseases by way of administering lethal medications like potassium chloride. Simply put, a doctor kills a patient with a terminal disease so as to end his or her suffering.

Mercy killing (euthanasia) is different from assisted suicide in the sense that in assisted suicide the patient carries out the act of ending his/her life with little assistance from the physician.

Mercy killing is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Some US states- Oregon, Washington, Montana and more lately, New Mexico, according to theguardian.com.

In Switzerland, mercy killing is not legal but assisted suicide is legal and has been in practice since 1941. Some clinics/ groups especially Exit and Dignitas- believed to be owned by a lawyer- are found in Switzerland and have been rendering euthanasia services to people all over the world. What that means is that people from across the world can go to either of these clinics and pay a certain amount of money to have their lives snuffed out. Weird, isn’t it?

The table below illustrates the increase in the demand for euthanasia, countries where it is legal and year it was legalised.

COUNTRY/STATE		YEAR LEGALISED	NUMBER OF PEOPLE EUTHANISED	YEAR
The Netherlands		April 2002	4,829	2013
			4,188	2012
			3,695	2011
			3,136	2010
			1,923	2006
Belgium		2003	1,807	2013
			1,432	2012
			1,133	2011
			708	2008
			235	2003
Luxembourg		2009	14	2011-2012
Switzerland (Assisted suicide)		1941	297	2009
			43	1998
Oregon (US)		1998	77	2012
			71	2011
			65	2010
			59	2009
			16	1998
Washington			83	2012
			70	2011
			51	2010
			36	2009

Source: Dailymail.com

Telegraph.co.uk

Theguardian.com

Let me quickly share with you something that caught my attention when I read One Door Away From Heaven by Dean Kootz. Through a character in the book- Preston Maddoc, who was nicknamed Dr Doom by his step daughter, Leilani Klonk- Dean brought to the fore a philosophy he considers a huge threat to humanity (And I agree with him)- Utilitarian Bioethics.

According to this philosophy, resources shouldn’t be wasted on terminally ill patients, the weak, the disabled and the elderly because they have outlived their usefulness to mankind. It preaches that this group of people are a burden to society and should be left to die or their deaths hastened through euthanasia (voluntary or involuntary) to give room to more vibrant people in the society.

For instance, if a 60-year old man is stricken with dementia and another 17-year-old boy go down with malaria, the 60-year-old dementia patient should be left to his fate because (according to their belief) it’s a waste of resources, time and effort to help him through his ailment since he is old and may never recover from his ailment. The medical care should be given to the 17-year-old malaria patient who has a high chance of survival and is still young. Their argument is based on the premise that the society would benefit little or nothing from the old and feeble while a ton of benefits can be harnessed from the young and vibrant.

What's your opinion? Let's discuss